‘Marvel's The Avengers’ 3D Is Not Obnoxious Says Joss Whedon

The director believes his aesthetic fits the 3D model for this superhero ensemble where, 'things tend to hurtle toward the screen.'
BY |
‘Marvel's The Avengers’ 3D Is Not Obnoxious Says Joss Whedon

Director Joss Whedon discusses Marvel's The Avengers 3D conversionEarlier today, Walt Disney Pictures announced Marvel's the Avengers will be converted for a 3D release. Director Joss Whedon recently spoke about the news, assuring fans that Marvel's the Avengers isn't, "obnoxiously 3D." Here's what the filmmaker had to say below.

"There's no, 'Oh look, we're going to spend 20 minutes going through this tunnel because it's in 3D!' And no one is pointing at the screen the entire time. But it's an action movie. Things tend to hurtle toward the screen anyway."

Joss Whedon also said he is fully behind the decision to covert Marvel's the Avengers to 3D in post-production, and that 3D fits his style of directing.

"Yeah, it's fun! I'm not a big fan of extreme long lens, talky movies. I like to see the space I'm in and relate to it, so 3D kind of fits my aesthetic anyway. And the technology has advanced so far in the past couple years."

Marvel's the Avengers is still keeping its May 4, 2012 release date, despite the 3D conversion.

Marvel's The Avengers was released May 4th, 2012.

Sources:JoBlo

Best of the Web

18 comments

Want to join the discussion?

Facebook Twitter
  • ghostman • 4 years ago

    As long as it isn't annoying in your face 3D like Whedon said, then I'm all for it!

    reply

    • moviegeek • 4 years ago

      Ohhh! So this is just unnecessarily converted! Hooray!

      Really people, read between the lines.

      reply

      • thedude1 • 4 years ago

        @messenger I agree with that completely. I have nothing against movies that are actually shot in 3D. I enjoy them. It is just that movies that are converted give 3D a bad vibe in general.

        reply

        • messenger • 4 years ago

          @thedude1

          I agree but if it were SHOT in 3D then that would be something else.

          reply

          • ROFLitschristian • 4 years ago

            @playhouse Oh okay. Thanks for the clarity. But it will just be The Avenger's when the time comes around, right?

            reply

            • shuabert • 4 years ago

              Captain America and Thor were little enhanced by the addition of 3D, so I have no reason to believe this will either. The movie is going to be awesome as it is.

              reply

              • thedude1 • 4 years ago

                There is no excuse for converted 3D. Just lazy and clearly a cash grab from the studio.

                reply

                • TheFury • 4 years ago

                  Wow, what a typical response from a filmmaker about this 3d extravaganza. OMG when will this 3d craze end. Avengers doesn't need 3d. Tell you want get rid of all this 3d sh*t and give me more Imax theaters in my area. Hell, I want Imax not 3d.

                  reply

                  • playhouse • 4 years ago

                    @slysnide@ROFLitschristian They had a press release this morning with the updated title ("3D"). Though, they've been referring to it as 'Marvel's The Avengers' in the trades and industry correspondence for a few months now.

                    reply

                    • ROFLitschristian • 4 years ago

                      @slysnide I've been wondering that too!

                      reply

                      • ROFLitschristian • 4 years ago

                        As much as I hate the 3D trend, I guarantee I won't have a problem watching this in it. But I'm glad he understands how obnoxious it can get.

                        reply

                        • slysnide • 4 years ago

                          Since when did they change the title?

                          reply

                          • rudy • 4 years ago

                            I hope Whedon knows what he's doing.

                            reply

                            • bawnian-dexeus • 4 years ago

                              @corey My short response to everything I don't like or agree with

                              reply

                              • playhouse • 4 years ago

                                Then why not film in 3D, Joss? Absolutely no reason to convert this, especially when the format is still trending downward in comparison to simultaneous 2D releases.

                                reply

                                • corey • 4 years ago

                                  @bawnian-dexeus Nope, what? lmao

                                  reply

                                  • themoviefanatic • 4 years ago

                                    Cool.

                                    reply

                                    • bawnian-dexeus • 4 years ago

                                      Nope

                                      reply

                                      Around The Web

                                      Latest Headlines

                                      Popular Movies