‘Robopocalypse’ Is Too Expensive to Shoot; Steven Spielberg Puts the Movie on Indefinite Hold

The screenplay by Drew Goddard is still not ready, with this sci-fi epic too elaborate to produce at this time.
BY |
‘Robopocalypse’ Is Too Expensive to Shoot; Steven Spielberg Puts the Movie on Indefinite Hold

Steven Spielberg's Robopocalypse put on an indefinite hold Fans of director Steven Spielberg who were looking forward to the director's return to the sci-fi genre with Robopocalypse will have to wait even longer. The 20th Century Fox and DreamWorks co-production has been indefinitely delayed. The project was initially set for an April 25, 2014 release date. Here's what the director's spokesperson, Marvin Levy, had to say in a statement.

"(It is) too important and the script is not ready, and it's too expensive to produce. It's back to the drawing board to see what is possible."

The screenplay adaptation of Daniel H. Wilson's sci-fi novel was written by Drew Goddard (The Cabin in the Woods). It isn't known if the studios are seeking new writers. Chris Hemsworth was in talks for the male lead, while Anne Hathaway and Ben Whishaw were circling the project as well. The story is set in the aftermath of a robotic uprising, focusing on how humanity has adapted after the machines took over.

The project was slated to be Steven Spielberg's next movie after Lincoln. It isn't known which of the director's many projects he will tackle next, now that this has faltered.

Robopocalypse is in development .

Best of the Web

30 comments

Want to join the discussion?

Facebook Twitter
  • instead8909 • 2 years ago

    1.5 million for CGI or more

    And the rest for crew and cast

    This sounds like a sequel to I-Robot

    reply

    • bawnian-dexeus • 2 years ago

      @jasonkat Let's not forget Avengers wasn't even shot in 3D, and all to just secure higher numbers in the first weekend

      reply

      • superman81 • 2 years ago

        I saw this movie already, its called I-Robot

        reply

        • Zak-Lee-Ferguson • 2 years ago

          shows what a prancing idiot Spielberg is.......i couldn't care less

          reply

          • Roberto-Mata • 2 years ago

            Forget this for now, check this awesome, Great, Fantastic news!!! Christopher Nolan may direct Interstellar!!! http://collider.com/christopher-nolan-interstellar/222939/

            reply

            • dark-888 • 2 years ago

              is this is a joke

              reply

              • jasonkat • 2 years ago

                @keesjecola

                About the 3d thing. Yes people go to them, (i know) but not every movie being made really needs it, While some look awesome, theres the other half of them that fail at all cost. think.. shark knight 3d, piranha 3dd, ghost rider 2 3d, silent hill 2 3d, ect, just to name a few.

                Seems like every movie being made today in 3d delivers more on eye candy than a good movie.

                If only movies were more like avengers, avatar, spiderman, (story wise) then it would be worth the price we pay..

                reply

                • jasonkat • 2 years ago

                  @felipe-11

                  Well you do have a point there. and i would have done the same thing, to build as much set as i could and use watever else i could to fill in the extras. Do we really know the real truth behind this movie tho?..is it money? is it a crappy script that needs a re-write?

                  Does Steven not have time on his plate? It could be alot of things, I know money might not be it but its part of it im sure.

                  reply

                  • Fry-3000 • 2 years ago

                    @felipe-11 exactly that's what I was thinking.

                    reply

                    • keesjecola • 2 years ago

                      @jasonkat Really? People don't go to 3D movies? Avengers, Avatar, Alice in Wonderland... All high grossing films. The general public is not so picky about 3D. And 50 out of a 100 go to 3D? Did not know that. We need to start a public awareness campaign.

                      @felipe-11 Your point is valid. Though I reckon cgi will be cheaper each sequel, because the data and digital models are already there.

                      Too bad about the movie though, maybe now he will redeem himself with an excellent Indy 5. (One can dream, right?)

                      reply

                      • felipe-11 • 2 years ago

                        @jasonkat That's a popular misconception. CGI is incredibly expensive, that's why Ridley Scott chose to build as much of the sets and use as many practical effects as possible on Prometheus, for example.

                        It's also why movies that use too much CGI and have low budgets usually look so bad (Lockout, just to name the first that came to mind).

                        reply

                        • narrator • 2 years ago

                          Because other generic action films weren't too expensive? Like Avatar? Pftt.

                          reply

                          • jasonkat • 2 years ago

                            If its CGI isnt that cheaper to make than gather top actors in which paying them would cost more to do. think.. transformers, jurassic park, i robot, ect. Just hand pack less than 4 main people and let CGI do the rest. & if u wanna save a few bucks, DONT make it in 3d, people dont go to 3d movies. yea 50 people out of 100? that doesnt count. :P

                            reply

                            • felipe-11 • 2 years ago

                              @Fry-3000 Avatar cost $200 mil and it is (whether you like the movie or not) the most visually stunning movie VFX-wise ever made so you can't really need much more than that.

                              So Steven, don't tell us that you can't get a $200 mil budget for a sci-fi movie.

                              reply

                              • bawnian-dexeus • 2 years ago

                                Complete BS.

                                reply

                                • crypt • 2 years ago

                                  Had not even heard of this movie previously... But with the title it sounds kinda like a direct to DVD sci fi/horror flick. Haha But I guess not.

                                  reply

                                  • Fry-3000 • 2 years ago

                                    Would be interesting on how much it was going to cost, $200 mil? Or more?

                                    reply

                                    • themoviefanatic • 2 years ago

                                      Well this news sucks. I was looking forward to see Robopocalypse.

                                      reply

                                      • moviegeek • 2 years ago

                                        I read the book and wasn't that impressed. But it definitely was cinematic material. Not sure it's all that different from other sci-fi films we've seen though, unless Spielberg really changes it up some. I'm glad they aren't rushing this thing out though... I mean, he bought the project before the book was even released so it seemed rushed from the get go.

                                        reply

                                        • ghostman • 2 years ago

                                          FUUUUUUUCK!!!!!

                                          reply

                                          Popular Stories

                                          Transformers 5: What We Know

                                          Transformers 5: What We Know

                                          Paramount is planning a huge shared universe for ‘Transformers’, with ‘Transformers 5’ set to kick things in motion.

                                          By B. Alan Orange | 1 week ago

                                          7.8k Shares6 Comments

                                          Stallone Returns as Rocky in ‘Creed’ Trailer

                                          Stallone Returns as Rocky in ‘Creed’ Trailer

                                          Michael B. Jordan plays the son of Apollo Creed, who gets training from Sylvester Stallone's Rocky Balboa in the first ‘Creed’ trailer.

                                          By Brian Gallagher | 3 days ago

                                          4.2k Shares6 Comments

                                          Latest Headlines

                                          Is ‘Star Wars: Rogue One’ Already Shooting?

                                          Is ‘Star Wars: Rogue One’ Already Shooting?

                                          A New report claims production is already under way at London's Pinewood Studios on ‘Star Wars: Rogue One’, with details on the scenes being shot.

                                          By Brian Gallagher | 7 hours ago

                                          27 Shares0 Comments

                                          Around the Web

                                          Popular Movies