SDCC 2009: EXCLUSIVE: No ‘Ghostbusters 3’ for Sigourney Weaver

The actress reveals that she has no interest in re-visiting the franchise.
BY |
SDCC 2009: EXCLUSIVE: No ‘Ghostbusters 3’ for Sigourney Weaver

During our with actress Sigourney Weaver for James Cameron's Avatar, we got the the chance to ask her if she had any interest in returning to the Ghostbusters franchise with the upcoming sequel, Ghostbusters 3 set to hit theaters in 2010.

"All I said was, look guys, if there is a Ghostbusting part for Dana's son Oscar, that's who I would like...

That's what you want, you don't want to be in it yourself?

That's alright, no...leave it to them."

Ghostbusters comes to theaters July 15th, 2016.

Best of the Web


Want to join the discussion?

Facebook Twitter
  • raoulduke33 • 6 years ago

    Bummer. Hopefully they can get Moranis.


    • newkill200 • 6 years ago

      They should just f*ck this new installment and let the new video game be the end.


      • pypebomb • 6 years ago


        Here's the f*cking link:

        If movieweb had its sh*t together, they would have already posted this.


        • 2movieguys • 6 years ago

          Damn!!! Sigourney Weaver is smart!!! 3 is not always magic!!!


          • diaigma • 6 years ago

            I figured as such :P


            • epsalon • 6 years ago

              Oh well. It would've been cool if she was in it, but her choice. :-/ This movie's still gonna rock!


              • m-man360 • 6 years ago

                This is a f*ck up, this movie is starting to loose cast members.


                • rufio • 6 years ago

                  i bet she cameos... good happy medium. her character was annoying in both films so i'm glad she's not returning; however, it would be nice to at least have a cameo of her so they don't just write her out.


                  • ikilledbill2wice • 6 years ago

                    i actually dont think she'll "take what she can get" nor do i think shes a bitch like wolfbiker but i mean cmon. shes at an age where she doesnt want to do something that she probably felt should have died at part 2. almost all the cast from part one who did part two, agreed it was terrible experience. so why go back to it?

                    plus at that age, you probably want to enjoy whatever money who have earned from hollywood. she doesnt need to be like one of these young actresses who HAS to do everything just to make a name for themselves.


                    • isa98 • 6 years ago

                      Like she has a choice, she hasn't been getting much lately. She should take what she can get.


                      • hackx9 • 6 years ago

                        cause she had very painful work on James Cameron Avatar movie and thats why she will no longer be on Ghostbusters 3


                        • drexll • 6 years ago

                          spoil sport.


                          • yahzee • 6 years ago

                            Don't call her names you wolfbiker904 moron, Sigourney surely has a good reason, and just, who the hell you think you are to think that she MUST be in another one? I would love to see her again, but that's totally up to her


                            • messenger • 6 years ago

                              Not to be a dick but what does she have going on to where she couldnt do it?


                              • ed-wood • 6 years ago

                                Oh well.


                                • tronticon • 6 years ago

                                  to bad.. would have been cool if she were in it! but it's still early!!!!!


                                  • wolfbiker904 • 6 years ago

                                    f*ckin bitch


                                    Around The Web

                                    Latest Headlines

                                    Popular Movies