Joined March 21st, 2010
who wrote this? I understand her abilities developed a little too fast, and she seemed more advanced than she should have been but how could she have had training, she thought jedi were a myth until she met solo.
No one is on because the awards are stupid and no one cares what people are wearing... Except the bond tribute that is well deserved
Thomas are you serious... first of all, a sequel following shaw will explain why they made the face grabbers smaller and the aliens bigger and why they are making them in the first place to wipe out races... second AvP is completely its own timeline, and the original predator and alien creators have nothing to do with them... they are stupid and are not connected in any way so why would ridley scott do anything to attached them to his alien chronology... also this is years and years before alien so there are a lot of things to happen before sigourney ever made it to space... This film was the perfect "prequel" stand alone story... most of you are morons how to do have such unrealistic and stupid expectations ... they literally showed why they were making aliens (to kill races) and now the sequel will show why they wanted to kill races and how their perfect killers evolved into the aliens we know and love... but serious who would be dumb enough to want to tie Predator and Alien to AvP.
why do people care about this...
sorry meant farrelly
wow i cannot fathom the cohen brothers using jersey shore hype to give them a cameo and make them think thye are actual actresses... now i wont see the movie...i met those retards at a bar last summer down the shore and they are all just awful human beings that eat up thinking they are actually famous
i like it, younger and sleeker and different, although i hope the mouth changes that is too bird like for me. Dont tell me thats doesnt look like a dinosaur beak
Also, getting it converted is just a time and money thing... there is not a different look from shooting and 3-d and transferring same as when you watch a dvd that was converted to HD for television... it looks the same...
I agree with art kid though, 3-d is ok but it doesnt make the movie much better, to me it gives me a head ache... im done with 3-d avatar was just as good normal...
i would say that it will be film transferred to 3D technology. Camerons 3-d cameras were special in that they were digitizing facial and body parts in real time so they could see their cgi avatars while still acting in front of a camera. I also think that film and digital are so similar now a days once its converted to 3-d or a digital reel because many theaters dont play reels. I think for a movie like Alien though he will go digital. The lighting effects will be more feasible in space and 35 mm cameras are so large anyway why use it unless you are really looking for a specific look. In my opinion though alien would look better on film.. a little quicker film speed, make it slightly gritty and grainy, it will look spectacular
and we do not hate this movie because it doesnt have blood and gore, we hate it because of how poorly they are made. Movies made for budgets over fifty million but take less than a year are always rushed. They wanted to make money while pattison and his queer friends still get girls going. It has nothing to do with gore. it has to do with terrible film making and the fact that some people get millions for doing nothing. any one can direct twighlight because it is a simple story with horrible special effects. A college student could easily edit this film on his macbook
hey emmytt... you write screen plays... that is so amazing... did you ever make one, or sell one or do you just keep them to yourself on your computer. yeah i had to write screen plays when i was in college too unfortuantely i dont like writing because my grammar is terrible and i find it tedious. my creativity comes in cinematography and gaffing work... you know camera and lights... the thing that gives all your gay pornos the pictures to show up on the computer.
not in the slightest... thats why she takes off her sweatshirt before running in slow motion in the dessert... i know that every movie sells sex im just telling him that he wasnt doing it for continuity sake of the shirts being rip it was just too make young girls hot and bothered for the first time
Also do you honestly think that they werent wearing shirts because the director was thinking that the wolves clothes will rip.. no they wanted to show that dude on steroids.. this movie isnt meant for anything other than to sell to little girls... i understand you defending it but dont talk like a moron liek the idiot director is paying respect wolves and vampires.. and also the acting is garbage except for the main girl.
well retard the reason the twighlight movie sucks isnt because they arent blood thirsty... its because they turn into bedazzled deuschebags everytime the sun goes down... that is why they hide themselves? and the CGI of the werewolves was childish and cheesy... my german shepherd is more intimidating than anything in the sh*tty as movie. Also, the dialogue is obvious and not creative. The fight scenes are all in slow motion which takes away from the emotion and power of the scene. And the director is obbsessed with using a circular dolly track to circle shots to emphasize time lapse and emotion. That is over used and not effective. it only makes little girls think you are a good cinematographer but if youve ever done any real film work and not just sit in your moms basement pounding mountain dew and jerking off to craiglist adds, you would understand the difference between good filmmaking and childs play .... thats for you emmytt.. you bash everyones post but you probably dont know sh*t about anything relating to film production, screenplay writing or adaptation or camera work... ass
vampires dont go out in the sun... that is the only internation rule of vampires other than that they have to drink some sort of blood to stay a vampire... that was even true of the lost boys... my favorite movie of all time.